Edmonton Social Planning Council

Category: **ESPC News and Announcements

  • Survey examines impact of losing Summer Temporary Employment Program

     

    by: Global News Staff

    EDMONTON – As we head into the summer months, cities, towns, and dozens of non-profit organizations will be feeling the impact of government cuts to a small but significant program: the Summer Temporary Employment Program (STEP), which was eliminated in March.

    The Edmonton Social Planning Council recently helped conduct a survey about the loss of STEP. Of the 27 municipal governments, and 207 non-profits across Alberta that responded, 56 per cent of respondents indicated they will not be able to maintain programs and services. Furthermore, 49 per cent said they will hire fewer students, and 36 per cent will not hire any students at all this year.

    “Over 89,000 people within Alberta – families and children – impacted, per year; and you know over 500 students hired, again, per year. And again, you know, this is just a very small sample. I think it’s much bigger than what we’ve been able to sort of portray in the sample that we’ve done,” said the Council’s Susan Morrissey.

    The Edmonton Federation of Community Leagues was one group which relied on STEP, and it wasn’t just all about Green Shack drop-in programs.

    “Many leagues, including our organization,” said the league’s Allan Bolstad, “was planning to hire a student this summer if we got a STEP grant to do some research work on our anniversary project; and leagues are writing history books…so I think quite a number of projects are going by the wayside because of it.”

    “(STEP) has really built up over the years to be a way for a lot of no- profit groups, in partnership with the provincial government to be able to augment their programming and be able to provide things in summer that just probably wouldn’t have happened otherwise,” explained Councillor Ben Henderson, who is chair of the Inter-city Forum on Social Policy, the other group behind the survey.

    “These were not 100 per cent funded programs by the province. The province put in x amount of dollars and everyone else was expected to come in and significantly top up the wages, and often, significantly top up the number of weeks that students were employed.”

    Henderson said it’s not just the provincial piece of the pie that’s being lost.

    “We end up losing that ability to leverage that other kind of effort to get significantly more than the sum of its parts.”

    The results of the survey have been forwarded to the Human Services Ministry, with the hope that the province will listen.

    “Our hope is that we will be able to work with government to look at what we might be able to do in terms of developing some other program that might better suit the needs,” said Morrissey.

    According to the Federation of Community Leagues, $150,000 dollars in one-time funding has been secured from the province to cover the Green Shack program in 15 high-needs areas of Edmonton.

    With files from Vinesh Pratap, Global News 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • High price, low vacancy: Edmonton’s short supply of apartments coupled with high demand leaves many renters lacking

    By Rebecca Medel, Vue Weekly

     

    Buying a new home is not an affordable option for many Canadians due to the fact that in the decade leading up to 2010, the price of a new home nearly doubled, while incomes didn’t even hit a double-digit increase.

    The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s (CMHC) Rental Market Report from October 2012 states that in 2001, the average price of a new home in Canada was $234 387, and by 2010 it rose to $454 154-$458 111 in Edmonton. To break it down even more: between 2006 and 2009, the average income for singles, couples and single parents only rose 5.5 percent, but the average cost of a new home increased 22 percent.

    These housing increases inevitably lead to a great deal of debt. Canada’s level of household debt-to-income is at 158 percent, and 68 percent of that is from mortgages. In its 2012 report “No Vacancy: Trends in Rental Housing in Canada,” the Federation of Canadian Municipalities states that since 2005, the cost of owning a home has risen three times faster than income. For this reason, many people continue to rent-one-third of Canadians are renters-but since 2000, the number of rental units has declined while the cost of renting has increased more than 20 percent.

    “Affordable rental housing is decreasing, and what we’re seeing is an increase in the number of condos that are being built as opposed to rental construction,” says FCM president and city councillor Karen Leibovici. She says that Edmonton has had an affordable-housing initiative for nearly 10 years, since the last economic boom happened and a lot of people were moving into the city.

    “It was very difficult to find accommodation and housing prices were increasing rapidly, but the number of rental units that were available were not increasing at the same rate as the level of need,” Leibovici says.

    But finding affordable rental units in Edmonton continues to be quite a challenge, as anyone who’s been on an apartment search can attest to. CMHC states that rents are up and vacancy rates are down. The average monthly rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Edmonton in 2012 was $1071, up 3.7 percent from a year earlier. But the vacancy rate of apartments was at 1.7 percent, down from 3.3 percent the previous year. A balanced vacancy rate sits at about three percent and affordable rental housing-including utilities-should cost less than 30 percent of before-tax household income, according to the CMHC.

    “Rents have actually gone up,” says John Kolkman, a public policy researcher with the Edmonton Social Planning Council, a research and advocacy organization that educates the public on social issues. “Between 2002 and 2012 they’ve gone up 51.1 percent, if you want to get technical. They haven’t gone up as much as home prices and I think part of the reason for that is that home prices have doubled, and part of the reason for that is low interest rates that made home ownership more affordable.”

    Many of Edmonton’s renters cannot even afford market rent and rely on rental subsidies or affordable-housing units. For example, the Capital Region Housing Commission (CRHC) offers rental units below market rent; tenants pay 10 to 20 percent less than the going rate. In 2012, the CRHC served 21 000 people-the majority of whom made less than $30 000 in annual household income-managed and operated over 5000 units and provided over 4000 rent supplements from a rent supplement budget of $18.5 million. One thousand households moved on from the housing programs that year, which allowed for 1000 to take their places, but over 2000 remain on the wait list.

    However, in the 2013 budget, the Alberta government cut funding to help low-income Albertans pay rent from $71.1 million in 2012 to $64.5 million in 2013.

    “That’s probably a recipe for financial hardship and for people at the very bottom end, possibly a bit of a recipe for increased homelessness despite the fact that the Alberta government says it’s committed to a 10-year plan to end homelessness,” Kolkman says. “Really, there’s no question that in a rental market where rents are going up and vacancy rates have gone down substantially, the amount of funding for rent supplements should be going up rather than being cut.”

    For one segment of Edmonton’s population-women and children leaving domestic-violence situations-finding affordable rentals is next to impossible.

    “I know a lot of our women struggle because most of them are living well below poverty level,” says Carrie-Lynn Mullin, an outreach worker with Edmonton’s women’s shelter, WIN House. “The rate at which they receive social services is well below the poverty level, so they’re very limited in what’s available to them, so they usually end up having to look for rents that are in the very lowest price range available in the city, and they’re often not suitable housing.”

    She says her clients often have to take dirty and run-down apartments in high-crime areas.
    “The reason they’re affordable is because landlords are having trouble renting them out,” Mullin adds. “So we do see a lot of inner-city housing available, oftentimes in buildings not suitable for children. We have stories about people coming and going selling drugs, prostitution.”

    Mullin says many places discriminate against the women because they are receiving social assistance rather than working or don’t have a letter of reference from a previous landlord-an absurd request when a woman and her children have been living with her partner up until that point. She says CRHC is a great program, but because the women are in immediate crisis, they don’t have time to wait for months-or years-for an apartment to become available. Shelter time is 21 days only (three months for a special shelter for immigrant women) and then they’re on their own.

    “I know the City of Edmonton offers HomeEd. It’s non-profit housing, so it’s not the same as Capital Region Housing, which is low-income,” Mullin says. “They offer low-market rent and they have a certain number of subsidized units in each complex and the rest are just below market price, so it is more affordable than renting privately. But we’ve actually had women turned away because they’re fleeing domestic violence and they told us that they will not accept [these] women, and their reasoning is that women come from a domestic violence situation, then they’ll move their partner back in and it causes damage and it causes fighting and they don’t want that in their complexes. … So that’s the city providing a service which is saying, ‘We’re not going to help the people who are obviously in the most need because they’re homeless and they’re on a fixed income and they need immediate help.’”

    When asked if this was true, Bill Bell, executive director of HomeEd, said he was unable to go into detail about situations where people are turned away, but said HomeEd does work with Wings of Providence, a secondary-stage shelter for women and children, if they request housing for their clients.

    Affordable rentals will continue to be an issue for Edmonton’s residents and for all Canadians in major centres. The FCM has suggested a number of things to make sure a good supply of rental units remain, including giving tax credits to developers who decide not to turn rentals into condos or giving tax credits for converting units into eco-energy rental housing. And since the federal government renewed its commitment to affordable housing programs in this year’s budget-which would have ended in 2014-the FCM will also have an opportunity to sit down with the appropriate departments and come up with a plan for the future of rental housing.

    In the meantime, wait lists are too long, rents are too high and vacancy rates remain too low

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • High price, low vacancy: Edmonton’s short supply of apartments coupled with high demand leaves many renters lacking

    By Rebecca Medel, Vue Weekly

     

    Buying a new home is not an affordable option for many Canadians due to the fact that in the decade leading up to 2010, the price of a new home nearly doubled, while incomes didn’t even hit a double-digit increase.

    The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s (CMHC) Rental Market Report from October 2012 states that in 2001, the average price of a new home in Canada was $234 387, and by 2010 it rose to $454 154-$458 111 in Edmonton. To break it down even more: between 2006 and 2009, the average income for singles, couples and single parents only rose 5.5 percent, but the average cost of a new home increased 22 percent.

    These housing increases inevitably lead to a great deal of debt. Canada’s level of household debt-to-income is at 158 percent, and 68 percent of that is from mortgages. In its 2012 report “No Vacancy: Trends in Rental Housing in Canada,” the Federation of Canadian Municipalities states that since 2005, the cost of owning a home has risen three times faster than income. For this reason, many people continue to rent-one-third of Canadians are renters-but since 2000, the number of rental units has declined while the cost of renting has increased more than 20 percent.

    “Affordable rental housing is decreasing, and what we’re seeing is an increase in the number of condos that are being built as opposed to rental construction,” says FCM president and city councillor Karen Leibovici. She says that Edmonton has had an affordable-housing initiative for nearly 10 years, since the last economic boom happened and a lot of people were moving into the city.

    “It was very difficult to find accommodation and housing prices were increasing rapidly, but the number of rental units that were available were not increasing at the same rate as the level of need,” Leibovici says.

    But finding affordable rental units in Edmonton continues to be quite a challenge, as anyone who’s been on an apartment search can attest to. CMHC states that rents are up and vacancy rates are down. The average monthly rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Edmonton in 2012 was $1071, up 3.7 percent from a year earlier. But the vacancy rate of apartments was at 1.7 percent, down from 3.3 percent the previous year. A balanced vacancy rate sits at about three percent and affordable rental housing-including utilities-should cost less than 30 percent of before-tax household income, according to the CMHC.

    “Rents have actually gone up,” says John Kolkman, a public policy researcher with the Edmonton Social Planning Council, a research and advocacy organization that educates the public on social issues. “Between 2002 and 2012 they’ve gone up 51.1 percent, if you want to get technical. They haven’t gone up as much as home prices and I think part of the reason for that is that home prices have doubled, and part of the reason for that is low interest rates that made home ownership more affordable.”

    Many of Edmonton’s renters cannot even afford market rent and rely on rental subsidies or affordable-housing units. For example, the Capital Region Housing Commission (CRHC) offers rental units below market rent; tenants pay 10 to 20 percent less than the going rate. In 2012, the CRHC served 21 000 people-the majority of whom made less than $30 000 in annual household income-managed and operated over 5000 units and provided over 4000 rent supplements from a rent supplement budget of $18.5 million. One thousand households moved on from the housing programs that year, which allowed for 1000 to take their places, but over 2000 remain on the wait list.

    However, in the 2013 budget, the Alberta government cut funding to help low-income Albertans pay rent from $71.1 million in 2012 to $64.5 million in 2013.

    “That’s probably a recipe for financial hardship and for people at the very bottom end, possibly a bit of a recipe for increased homelessness despite the fact that the Alberta government says it’s committed to a 10-year plan to end homelessness,” Kolkman says. “Really, there’s no question that in a rental market where rents are going up and vacancy rates have gone down substantially, the amount of funding for rent supplements should be going up rather than being cut.”

    For one segment of Edmonton’s population-women and children leaving domestic-violence situations-finding affordable rentals is next to impossible.

    “I know a lot of our women struggle because most of them are living well below poverty level,” says Carrie-Lynn Mullin, an outreach worker with Edmonton’s women’s shelter, WIN House. “The rate at which they receive social services is well below the poverty level, so they’re very limited in what’s available to them, so they usually end up having to look for rents that are in the very lowest price range available in the city, and they’re often not suitable housing.”

    She says her clients often have to take dirty and run-down apartments in high-crime areas.
    “The reason they’re affordable is because landlords are having trouble renting them out,” Mullin adds. “So we do see a lot of inner-city housing available, oftentimes in buildings not suitable for children. We have stories about people coming and going selling drugs, prostitution.”

    Mullin says many places discriminate against the women because they are receiving social assistance rather than working or don’t have a letter of reference from a previous landlord-an absurd request when a woman and her children have been living with her partner up until that point. She says CRHC is a great program, but because the women are in immediate crisis, they don’t have time to wait for months-or years-for an apartment to become available. Shelter time is 21 days only (three months for a special shelter for immigrant women) and then they’re on their own.

    “I know the City of Edmonton offers HomeEd. It’s non-profit housing, so it’s not the same as Capital Region Housing, which is low-income,” Mullin says. “They offer low-market rent and they have a certain number of subsidized units in each complex and the rest are just below market price, so it is more affordable than renting privately. But we’ve actually had women turned away because they’re fleeing domestic violence and they told us that they will not accept [these] women, and their reasoning is that women come from a domestic violence situation, then they’ll move their partner back in and it causes damage and it causes fighting and they don’t want that in their complexes. … So that’s the city providing a service which is saying, ‘We’re not going to help the people who are obviously in the most need because they’re homeless and they’re on a fixed income and they need immediate help.’”

    When asked if this was true, Bill Bell, executive director of HomeEd, said he was unable to go into detail about situations where people are turned away, but said HomeEd does work with Wings of Providence, a secondary-stage shelter for women and children, if they request housing for their clients.

    Affordable rentals will continue to be an issue for Edmonton’s residents and for all Canadians in major centres. The FCM has suggested a number of things to make sure a good supply of rental units remain, including giving tax credits to developers who decide not to turn rentals into condos or giving tax credits for converting units into eco-energy rental housing. And since the federal government renewed its commitment to affordable housing programs in this year’s budget-which would have ended in 2014-the FCM will also have an opportunity to sit down with the appropriate departments and come up with a plan for the future of rental housing.

    In the meantime, wait lists are too long, rents are too high and vacancy rates remain too low

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Alberta Social Policy Framework

    February 2013

    During the summer of 2012, the Edmonton Social Planning Council ran a series of discussions with marginalized groups in our community to learn more about what they would like to see in the Government of Alberta’s Social Policy Framework. During each discussion, we recorded the main themes that were discussed. This information was used to create summary reports for each discussion. These reports, which are listed below, contain valuable information about the various challenges that marginalized Edmontonians face in our community. They also demonstrate the need for an effective Social Policy Framework that addresses social inequality in our province.

    In February 2013, Alberta Human Services had released the Social Policy Framework.

    Our Focus Group Discussion Summaries

  • Redford Government challenged to ‘Achieve the Promise’: Report reveals 91,000 children live in poor families

    Media Release
    November 20, 2012

    A new report on child and family poverty outlines the challenge Alberta faces if we are going to eliminate child poverty in five years and reduce poverty for everyone in ten years, as promised by Premier Redford during the recent provincial election.

    The report, entitled “Achieving the Promise: Ending Poverty in Alberta”, was published on National Child Day, November 20th by the Edmonton Social Planning Council, the Alberta College of Social Workers and Public Interest Alberta. This report is one of many reports being released across the country by the national coalition, Campaign 2000. Some of the main findings of the report include:

    • 91,000 children under the age of 18 were living below the low-income measure (LIM after tax), 11.3% of all Alberta children.

    • The poverty rate was higher for children under the age of six with one in six children, (17.2% = 48,200 children) below the LIM.

    • The majority (52%) of children living in poverty had at least one parent working full time, full year.

    • There is growing inequality in Alberta with the wealthiest 10% of families seeing their incomes double in 20 years while the bottom 10% have seen only marginal increases.

    • The good news is that as that there was a 12% decrease in the number of children from the previous year and that the number of children lifted out of poverty by all government transfers has increased to 47.2%.

    John Kolkman, Research Coordinator for the Edmonton Social Planning Council and lead author of the report says, �The latest data shows that while government transfers and a strengthening economy is helping to lift some children out of poverty, it is clear much more needs to be done to address the barriers that result in 91,000 Alberta children living in low income.�

    “The Premier’s promise to eliminate child poverty in five years is a bold commitment that will only be achieved if it is matched with an equally bold and comprehensive approach to address the root causes of poverty,” says Bill Moore-Kilgannon, Executive Director of Public Interest Alberta. “Unfortunately, the provincial government seems to not want to invest any new funding to achieve this goal, so it will be up to citizens and civil society organizations to keep pressing for a real commitment to eliminate poverty in Alberta.”

    “Social workers see the suffering of children and families living in poverty every day.  Alberta is a rich province with vast resources.  We can end poverty in Alberta.  Let’s invest in our richest resource of all, our citizens,” says Lori Sigurdson, Manager, Professional Affairs, Alberta College of Social Workers.

    The report was launched at simultaneous forums in Edmonton and Calgary that were video linked together and live streamed over the internet. A number of people from various sectors of society presented their views on what solutions need to be included in the Social Policy Framework that Minister Hancock has just completed public consultations into. These forums were sponsored by the Alberta College of Social Workers, the Faculty of Social Work at the University of Calgary, Public Interest Alberta, The United Way of the Alberta Capital Region and were also supported by many other civil society groups.

    “This forum provides the opportunity for a broad discussion of the impacts of poverty and real solutions for ending poverty”, said Jackie Sieppert, Dean of the Faculty of Social Work at the University of Calgary.  “I hope the conversation started here creates momentum for educating people about the issue of poverty and concrete social policy changes to support poverty reduction.   Both are essential to the people of Alberta.”

    The Child Well-Being Initiative of the Women of the United Church of Canada are holding a rally at the provincial legislature at 12:30 where they will have tens of thousands of paper dolls on display representing the number of children living in poverty. A Calgary member of the group, Carolyn Pogue said, “When we see that more than half the homeless who come to our church for a bed our children, we think this is an emergency. Charity is not enough. This is our third time back to the provincial legislature and we want action now.”

    -30-

    Media Contacts:
    Bill Moore-Kilgannon (780) 993-3736
    Jackie Sieppert (403) 220-5945

    To view the entire document CLICK Here.

  • Alberta Child Poverty Increases 40%

    Media Release
    November 23, 2011

    The Edmonton Social Planning Council, Public Interest Alberta and the Alberta College of Social Workers released a new report today entitled In This Together: Ending Poverty in Alberta. This report shows the number of children living in poverty rose dramatically from 53,000 to 73,000 in just one year (from 2008 to 2009).

    “Almost half (47%) of these children living below the low income cut off (LICO After Tax) are living in families where the household works full time hours for the entire year, yet they are still living in poverty, ” says John Kolkman Research Coordinator at the ESPC and the main report author. “The recession has plunged thousands more families with children into poverty. While existing government transfers have helped many families, we see far too many people falling through the cracks.”

    “With one in four employed people in Alberta making less than $15/hour, we are seeing increased levels of poverty as many families are not able to keep up with increasing cost of living,” says Lori Sigurdson, Professional Affairs Coordinator, Alberta College of Social Workers. “Women in particular are being hit hard by poverty in both two parent households (poverty increased to 8% of two parent households from 3.4%) or as single parents where 16% of all lone parent families are in poverty.”

    “This report should be a very serious wake up call to the Redford government that they can’t just sit back and expect the economy alone to support Alberta families,” says Bill Moore-Kilgannon, Executive Director of Public Interest Alberta. “We know that Alberta has the means to invest in a comprehensive poverty reduction strategy that can prevent, reduce and ultimately eliminate poverty in Alberta. What has sadly been lacking is the political will to support Alberta’s families.”

    The In This Together: Ending Poverty in Alberta report also presents many recommendations that would benefit not only those individuals and families living in poverty, but will have a very positive impact on strengthening our communities and our economy.

    -30 –

    Media Contacts:
    John Kolkman – Edmonton Social Planning Council, 780 423-2031 (ext 350)
    Lori Sigurdson – Alberta College of Social Workers, 780 421-1168
    Bill Moore-Kilgannon – Public Interest Alberta, 780 993-3736 (cell)

    The full report is available hereand on all three websites:
    www.pialberta.org             www.acsw.ab.ca             www.edmontonsocialplanning.ca